contract for water supply equipment, frequency conversion, in fact, it is water tanks. Fryer, who lives in the East Court found that the owners of the Friends of the company after the developer to court to demand compensation. Yesterday, the Minhang District Court by every owner of 8736.50 yuan was made in the Friends of the Shanghai Real Estate Development Co., owners of a total of 76 compensation 66.3974 million verdict.
2002 years 12 months, Mr. Gu to the price of 37 million yuan to purchase in the Friends of the Road 1699 is located in Minhang District龙茗Court Lane East Blangah housing. Contract, housing renovation, equipment standards less than the standard contract, the owners have the right to request the Friends of the company according to the actual renovation, equipment and agreed renovation, equipment price of 0.5 times the compensation. Annex to the contract agreed: household-based water meter, water pipes into the households, frequency of water supply. The summer of 2005, Mr. Gu owners found water quality problems exist, to know the water supply equipment by the frequency of water supply contract has been converted into a tank of water.
2006年10月, owners such as Mr. Gu district where the owners of the Committee of Friends of the company to issue a written letter, said the water supply system has been replaced by water tanks to the owners had an impact on the quality of life has been constitute a breach of contract. As a result has yet to solve the problem, Mr. Gu and other 76 owners will be in the Friends of the company to court, to claim compensation.
of Friends of the companies considered that the case has expired statute of limitations, Mr. Gu and other owners have lost the right to win. Water tanks of buildings for the owners of public facilities should be shared, contract equipment is attached to every owner of that part of their equipment, owners should be assessed, so Mr. Gu and other 76 owners filed for compensation, the lack of a contract basis.
The court held that the Friends of the company in the delivery of housing, water supply equipment for the tank water supply, breach of contract. Therefore, Mr. Gu and other 76 owners to compensation 0.5 times the difference between the file, in line with the contractual agreement between the two sides should be supported. Since signing with the owners of Friends, the contract did not inform the frequency of water tanks to replace the fact that the water supply, leading to the owners after the purchase has been mistaken for water supply equipment for its use of frequency of water supply lines, fault liability in the company of Friends . In addition, in connection with the case of water supply problems, such as Mr. Gu owner summer solstice in 2005 continued in October 2006 to negotiate, so the owners of the file, such as Mr. Gu does not have limitation of action.
76业主有利于开发商，开发商为66万元赔偿
合同供水设备，变频，事实上，这是水箱。傅兰雅，谁住在东方法院认为，业主之友公司开发后向法院要求补偿。昨天，闵行区法院的每一位业主的八千七百三十六点五○元是在好友的上海房地产开发公司，业主的共有76补偿66397400判决。
二零零二年12个月，谷先生的价格为37多万元，购买的朋友的路1699年，位于闵行区龙茗法院巷东布兰雅住房。合同，房屋装修，设备标准，低于标准合同，业主有权要求之友公司按实际装修，设备，并同意装修，设备价格的0.5倍的赔偿。附件合同商定：家庭为基础的水表，水管进入家庭，频率供水。 2005年夏天，顾先生业主发现水质存在问题，了解供水设备的频率供水合同已被改造成一箱水。
2006年10月，业主如区先生的业主委员会之友公司发出书面信函，表示供水系统已取代水箱的业主产生了影响对生活质量的已构成违约。由于还没有解决问题，顾先生等76业主将在友公司诉至法院，要求赔偿。
之友公司认为，此案已过期时效法规，谷先生和其他业主的权利已经失去取胜。水箱的楼宇业主的公共设施应该共享，合同设备连接到每一位业主的这一部分的设备，业主应进行评估，以便顾先生和其他76个业主提出的赔偿，缺乏合同基础。
法院认为，友公司交付房屋，供水设备，水箱供水，违反了合同。因此，顾先生和其他76个业主赔偿0.5倍之间的差别文件，按照合同约定双方之间应该得到支持。由于与业主签订的朋友，没有通知合同的频率水箱来代替事实，即供水，导致业主购买后一直误认为是供水设备供其使用的频率的供水线，过错责任公司的朋友。此外，与案件有关的供水问题，如先生，顾老板在2005年夏至2006年10月继续进行谈判，以便业主的档案，如顾先生没有限制的行动。
标签： , , ,