Song Chunhua, said:
size is too large to become the primary building energy-saving issues
Song Chunhua pointed out that the size is too large has become Chinas building energy efficiency by the first problem to be solved.
according to Chinas latest policy definition, consumers enjoy the ordinary standards of housing policy is less than 120 square meters, at the same time permit floating around the 20%, that is, less than 144 square meters.
Song Chunhua said,
It is understood that from 1990 to 2002, the Japanese average of new residential units in the basic 8-10 square meters between the floating. In developed countries, over a long period of residence after practice, has selected a line with the moderate, reasonable, sustainable development units range: single set of residential building area in the 85-100 square meters between. In the last century 70s largest units have to do 115 square meters. Now, the unit again to return to a reasonable range. In 2002, Japan, Sweden and Germany, the three developed countries, the average new residential construction area are: 85 square meters, 90 meters, 99 square meters.
Japan is a highly market-oriented countries, but domestic issues are planned, a total of seven houses to do five-year plan. Japan Finally a residential five-year plan to 2000, they put forward a new residential standard calculations based on: a couple plus one child of three homes, the standard size of 75 square meters; 4 to 91 square meters home. It is understood that the three homes standard units, in addition to two bedrooms, a living room, along with restaurant 7.5 square meters, kitchen 5 square meters, bath space 8 square meters, 6.5 square meters storage, aisle five square meters.
Song Chunhua think, this is a group of very stringent data, the actual function of the so-called luxury than domestic more reasonable and there is storage space and washing, bathing and toilet facilities split in three parts, reflecting the He said.
In fact, the United Nations Development Program as early as in 1998 human development report on the 20th century, summed up the gains and losses for human consumption and a warning: the 20th century, the rapid growth of human consumption, but there are some errors in there show off type, competition type, type ostentatious and extravagant consumption.
Song Chunhua said:
promote regeneration of old buildings design, to avoid damaging the building
Song Chunhua pointed out that many of our normal service life of construction were forcibly removed, greatly shorten the life of Chinas residential, this is not consistent with energy conservation and conservation-minded society, a waste of resources is another major cause.
It is understood that in accordance with national mandatory standards for the rational use of life, ordinary buildings useful life is 50 years. Quality management of the State Council, the requirement of the Ordinance, the architectural design of the document to specify the design life span. Kung University in Taiwan has selected 11,000 samples for statistical analysis, we found large quantities of 20,30 years old building was removed, and even built in 2012 has just been removed, and in these buildings were removed over the rare age of 50 years. Results showed: the average life expectancy of our construction is 23.21, after the projection is a maximum of 30 years, while Japan projected building life cycle is 38 years, the European average life cycle of building more than 80 years.
Song Chunhua In his speech, mentioned that
while the eye of the old building to a completely different attitude.
in Oslo, in 1953 built a vat abandoned grain warehouse, the Government has decided to invite tenders for its re-use, and finally the use of the successful bidder is converted to a college apartment. Through the transformation of the design, built from the middle of open channels, on both sides is the auxiliary room, as a small kitchen and so on, which as a student living with, and now the old granary has turned to become 16-story apartment college students.
from the functional point of view, originally as a granary, which is also the main钢混结构, but in itself make the exterior insulation; modified, in the re-elevation brush on paint, modeling on a very unique and Some post-modern means.
from a cultural point of view, the transformation of persons is based on respect for cultural, historical importance of the attitude to carry out renewable designed, in the apartment entrance, to retain the delivery of food to the time when an electric locomotive front, but also retain the use of to that large scale food.
This is the domestic attitude towards the old building is totally different from the old treatment of the common practice in the domestic construction can be said that , usually the one blown up.
Song Chunhua made, we advocate the adoption of maintenance and renovation works to improve the living environment of the old building to extend its serviceable life.
宋春华主席建筑学会：建筑节能不能乐观
“的现状，中国的建筑节能不容乐观。 ”最近，房地产行业协会的中国城市发展专业委员会，中国工业和商业的报纸， “财产”杂志联合举办的“住宅和办公建筑节能研讨会” ，并宋春华主席建筑学会中国指出： “中国的住房建设应提倡适度，合理和可持续发展的原则。 ”
宋春华说： “目前市场的这种现象，在努力倡导节能和消费者科学的同时，越来越多的单位数量。然而，相比下， 2004年，中国的国家的人均国内生产总值是一千二美元只有“ 。
规模太大，无法成为主要的建筑节能问题
宋春华指出，规模过大，已成为中国的建筑节能的{dy}个问题有待解决。
根据中国{zx1}的政策界定，消费者享受普通标准住房的政策是不超过120平方米，在同一时间允许浮动20 ％左右，也就是说，不到144平方米。
宋春华说， “当我们的国家，而且也为普通一四四平方米住宅的界限，在日本已经是一种sc。人均GDP1000美元的国家，生活在一四四平方米或普通住宅，它可以反映了我们生活的基本的概念，消费者的问题。 “
据了解， 90年至02年，日本平均的新住宅单位，基本8-10平方米之间浮动。在发达国家，长期居住在实践中，选择了符合适度，合理，可持续发展的单位范围：单一的一套住宅建筑面积在85-100平方米之间。在上个世纪70年代至90年代，这些新的住宅单位发达国家已越来越大，瑞典{zd0}的单位必须做115平方米。现在，该股再次回到一个合理的范围内。 2002年，日本，瑞典和德国这三个发达国家新建住宅平均建筑面积是： 85平方米， 90米， 99平方米。
日本是一个高度市场为导向的国家，但国内问题是规划，一共有7家这样的五年计划。日本{zh1}一个住宅五年计划到2000年，他们提出了一个新的住宅标准计算的基础上：一对夫妇加一个孩子的3家，标准尺寸为75平方米; 4 91平方米回家。据了解，这三个家庭的标准单位，除了两间卧室，客厅，还有餐厅七点五平方米，厨房五平方米，浴室空间八平方米，六点五平方米储存，走道五平方米。
宋春华认为，这是一组非常严格的数据，但实际功能的所谓豪华比国内更合理和有存储空间和洗衣机，洗澡和厕所设施分为三个部分，反映了“精巧的设计“的概念。 “在这一点上，目前的住房建设在我国确实无法相比。 ”他说。
事实上，联合国开发计划署早在1998年人类发展报告对20世纪，总结了得失供人消费和警告： 20世纪，快速增长的人食用，但有一些错误，有炫耀型，竞争型，摆阔型的消费。
宋春华说： “如果这个问题的大小可以更合理，在不降低舒适度，不降低生活质量的前提下，单位面积做一个小问题，买家可减少沉重的压力，并减少长期住房消费中可观的费用。 “
促进再生旧式楼宇的设计，避免破坏性建设
宋春华指出，我们的许多正常使用寿命的建筑被强行拆除，大大缩短中国的生活的住宅，这是不符合节约能源和节约型社会，资源浪费的另一个重要原因。
据了解，按照国家强制性标准的合理使用的生活，普通建筑的使用寿命是50年。质量管理，国务院的要求，该条例的规定，建筑设计的文件，以指定的设计寿命。在台湾成功大学已选定11,000个样本进行统计分析，我们发现了大量的20,30岁的建设已被删除，甚至建于2012年刚刚被拆除，并在这些建筑被拆除的罕见年龄50岁。结果表明：平均预期寿命是23.21我们建设后，预计最长为30年，而日本预计建设周期为38年，欧洲的平均寿命周期的建设超过80年。
宋春华在讲话中提到， “最近拆除在重庆市会展中心，这三四千万元建造费用的公共建筑投入使用仅5年。这种做法是财富消失，是对环境的污染和材料的浪费！ “
而眼睛的老建筑，以一种wq不同的态度。
在奥斯陆，在1953年建立了一个被遗弃的粮食仓库增值税，政府已决定招标的再利用，并最终使用中标转换为大学生公寓。通过改造设计，建造，来自中东的公开渠道，双方是辅助房间，作为小厨房等，作为一名学生生活，现在旧粮仓已经转向成为16层公寓大学生。
从功能的角度来看，原来作为粮仓，也是主要的钢混结构，而且本身就是使外墙外保温;修改，在重新海拔刷上油漆，造型上非常独特的，有些后现代的手段。
从文化的角度来看，改造者是以尊重文化，具有重要历史意义的态度进行再生设计的，在公寓入口，保留运送粮食的时候，电动机车方面，而且还保留使用这种大规模的粮食。
这是国内的态度老建筑wq不同的旧zl常见的做法在国内建设可以说， “太残忍” ，通常是一炸了， 。
宋春华提出，我们主张通过维修和翻新工程，以改善居住环境的老建筑，以延长其使用寿命。 “不建立自己的原因被删除，而且也得到相应的部门和专家，重要的是大量的建筑甚至进入听证程序。 ”
Tags: , , ,